EQ Item |
Great for all that can use |
Anonymous |
Aug 1st, 2001 |
Default |
|
I play a Warrior (level 54) and a Druid (level 42). All of you who are saying this is not good for a druid or not good for a warrior or any of that crap is wrong. Verant made this cloak usable by those classes because it is USEFUL to all of those classes. The high AC and excellent melee stats are |
EQ Item |
RE: Knowing your role..... |
Anonymous |
Aug 1st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
where to begin, where to begin...
First off, if you have higher ac than war's in your group (unbuffed), than you have to be twinked, or those warriors a prety pathetic. We can't hold a candle to any warrior dual weilding two weapons, they have better weapons, higher skill, and basically have a c |
EQ Item |
RE: Knowing your role..... |
Anonymous |
Aug 1st, 2001 |
Default |
|
Actually I have a lvl 42 Druid, TYVM. I melee with him from time to time in groups, but I know one key thing.... The group doesnt need my melee damage. Not at all... it doesnt benefit the group except for maybe cutting a few rounds off the fight. A druid is more benefit managing his mana pool the |
EQ Item |
add to the below post... |
Anonymous |
Aug 1st, 2001 |
Default |
|
I forgot to address the haste issue for warriors. It is true that haste is very important to warriors. However, at higher levels, warriors will ALWAYS be grouped and ALMOST ALWAYS have an enchanter in the group. Yes, haste items will stack with some chanter haste spells, but back slot is not the |
EQ Item |
RE: add to the below post... |
Anonymous |
Aug 1st, 2001 |
Default |
|
Saying an item is great for a class is one thing.... This *is* a *great* item for all the classes listed... But we just need to be realistic in where it would find the most use. |
EQ Item |
Mobs/Faction? |
REDACTED |
Aug 1st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Well, unfortunately, seeing as the majority of the posts were the same tired arguments about why such-and-such a class should get this because they roxx0rs and everyone else suxx0rs, I didn't bother reading the rest of them. I was sort of looking for actual information, so thought it would probably |
EQ Item |
RE: Amazing... |
Darknyss |
Aug 1st, 2001 |
Decent |
|
hehe...
IC 40 45 and can bash too, procs huge lifetap
sorry, somebody had to put the SK's epic up here... really sorry, but face it, both classes are great... it's the twinked idiots that lose duels that make our classes look bad )
|
EQ Item |
let us end... |
REDACTED |
Aug 2nd, 2001 |
Default |
|
Let us end these meanless fighting. If your raid leader wants to handed it out to a druid, good, a warrior, great, a ranger, exelent, it doesn't matter. Everybody just know if you want it to go to the best class, take out your Di, and roll away. Whoever wins is the best class for the item that roll. |
EQ Item |
... |
REDACTED |
Aug 2nd, 2001 |
Default |
|
stop argueing! it should go to me =) |
EQ Item |
Real info |
Anonymous |
Aug 2nd, 2001 |
Excellent |
|
Not in either, this drops in the Forbidden area of the zone, off of Lady Nevedaria. They are all on GuardiansOfVeeshan faction, which is kos to all starting and no +GoV exists. In addition, the dragons give pretty large -CoV faction hits, making it difficult (but not impossible) for CoV people to hu |
EQ Item |
Haste % = 27 |
REDACTED |
Aug 2nd, 2001 |
Good |
|
Haste is 27% on RBG, according to item collector. |
EQ Item |
RE: Real info |
Anonymous |
Aug 2nd, 2001 |
Default |
|
yes ToV is full out balls to the wall raid force zone 4-6+ full groups of L58+...Best to have 100+ all resists and able to get over 200+ per encounter as needed...it is a neat zone tho...just plan on long CR's if thing go bad, and they will till you and your raiding party learn the mobs and the zone |
EQ Item |
Warrior |
REDACTED |
Aug 3rd, 2001 |
Default |
|
Not saying who it's best for or anything like that. But chances are this is going to be given to a warrior because of the ungodly ac on the back. Sweet cloak, really looking forward to ToV.
Nods |
EQ Item |
RE: Ummm.... |
REDACTED |
Aug 3rd, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Hehe, you are silly. Many bows inculding most of the can be used by warriors. The BFG for example. Not only that but I believe warriors get there own throwing weapons that have a huge damage on them, Throwing Boulders. So warriors are respected on the field of range items.
|
EQ Item |
Ranger? |
REDACTED |
Aug 3rd, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Ok guys, here is my take on who should get it. Rangers have by far the worst AC of any tank. The Str and Wis are a major bonus, but I am inclined to believe this would be ideal for a Ranger at 55+ Just my 2cp |
EQ Item |
RE: VI is getting lazy again |
REDACTED |
Aug 4th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
All the intiate symbols are the same, except for the god worshipped and the spell they cast. Rallos Zek - Yaulp (cleric level 1 spell. Useless because they put a long casting time on it, but it only lasts 18 seconds.) Tribunal - summon magic hammer (same as cleric level 9 spell). Innoruuk - Weakness |
EQ Item |
what the hell |
REDACTED |
Aug 4th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Ok verant finaly starts puting thing that actualy looks like its Roleplay oriented and you come out and bach it. I mean of course they are gonna have simmilar effect they are all godly sybols but you can now not only be "lev X clerc/shaman of X god" but be an initiat, neonate or whatever i aprouv |
EQ Item |
RE: VI is getting lazy again |
REDACTED |
Aug 4th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
The first symbol for Tunare worshippers is a poison/disease resist buff. +10 each, not a spell already in existence. Second symbol is an upgrade to the first +15 each. Third symbol casts grasping (?) roots, the lvl 5 druid root spell which does 10 DD in addition to the root. Has a loooooong cast |
EQ Item |
Yeah... |
REDACTED |
Aug 4th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Yeah, it's kind of stupid that anyone besides WIS casters has to get to velious for this kind of quest, even if some of the symbols aren't all that great, it would be nice;
As for stats being the same as the Rallos Zek symbol, yes it is; but if I recall correctly, yaulp and strengthen stack, and |
EQ Item |
not bad |
REDACTED |
Aug 5th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Hey, obviously if you can afford better, you will. If you can't, this is not so bad. Hope I can get a hold of a full set of this for some friends of mine =) |
EQ Item |
RE: Proc? |
REDACTED |
Aug 5th, 2001 |
Default |
|
This doesn't proc. There is no effect, hehe. |
EQ Item |
Quests |
REDACTED |
Aug 5th, 2001 |
Good |
|
I think these quests are great. I love getting things that proc, esspecially at low levels. And when you can get this item on your own, makes you feel good to have it. Also, don't you want yer clerics to have higher WIS for more healing anyways? |
EQ Item |
Nice but... |
REDACTED |
Aug 5th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
My guild recently killed Telk and 2 of these dropped, so myself and the only other pally present recieved these swords. While this is a great weapon, it still sits in my backpack most of the time in favor of my FD. In most cases I prefer the resists and hp's I get from my epic as I am rarely doing a |
EQ Item |
hmmm |
REDACTED |
Aug 6th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Prayer shawl from Kedge +8 Wis and not as Difficult to get... Ahh what the Heck North ToV looks like fun !
|
EQ Item |
Awesome bow |
REDACTED |
Aug 6th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Delay is the key in how much damage is done in a bow, therefore, more delay with alot of DD, you have more dmg shots, and IF you are high enough to achieve the success of looting one of these fine bows, you probably would have been able to obtain a tolans bracer, which equals infinite arrows. I did |