Quote:
DIRECT QUESTION: HOW DOES SOMEONE LIKE YOU WHO KNOWS OH SO MUCH MORE THAN ME EXPLAIN THE ABOVE????
To which I already answered:
Quote:
And to briefly respond to you level 18 stamina upgrade, I may be wrong but EVERY PLAYER gets choices to upgrade any one of their stats at various levels. The ones I am referring to are the Level 8, 14, 22, and so on. Level 8 has a choice of Durable which adds +4 to stamina. So, THAT is what I was talking about.
The level 18 choice, I had confused with another choice. That was a mistake on my part, but I explained that there are other choices. Even still the small additional STA added does not make a huge difference as you are adamant that it does.
---------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
DIRECT QUESTION: WHAT SPELLS DOES A GUARDIAN HAVE THAT INT WILL APPLY TO? As far as I'm aware, Guardians use COMBAT ARTS, not spells.
The explanation that it effects spells landing is confusing, I will give you that. What it means is it effects Spells and Combat Arts and their ability to bypass enemy encounters resistances. For instance, when you Taunt, and it gets resisted. I could be wrong, but there must be SOMETHING that dictates if it resists or not. Be my guest to find out and prove me wrong that it does not effect that. The information I provided was from the SOE EQ2 message boards.
---------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
DIRECT QUESTION: SINCE WHEN DOES STR INCREASE MELEE HIT POSSIBILITY? Last I've heard, and I believe is stated on every EQ2 site and in the manual, AGI increases your melee hit possibility.
I copied and pasted what was on the SOE boards. I have no doubt that strength is figured into the equasion, as is agility. Strength helps you achieve a higher damage within your current damage range. This argument is not about Strength though, so why you changed the subject is beyond me.
---------------------------------------------------------
To address your off-topic retort:
Quote:
Big surprise, GXM wrote another 3 screen post. Don't critique my writing technique while you are blabbing on and on in one of your novels. [1]You don't have to quote everything you know. And if you have problems reading block text, you have a lot more to worry about then stat mods. This is the exact reason why I'm getting testy with you, [2]because you talk down to me like you know something I don't. [3]Anyone who actually performs the experiments the way i've laid them out can and will see that I know what I'm talking about. Anyone else can **** off. Let me clarify something to you, [4]I don't give a rat's *** about credibility. If someone chooses not to listen to me, thats their prerogative. THat goes for you too. If you disagree, say so once then shut your mouth. You have nothing to prove and no reason to keep arguing. It takes a real small minded individual to blindly argue everything without even opening his tiny mind to the possibility that he may be wrong. I tried what you said and it was all messed up.
1. It appears I DO have to quote everything or you accuse me of not answering your questions.
2. I am not talking down to anyone, I am arguing my points, providing information, and doing so in a calm, non-aggressive manner.
3. Which experiments? Everything you have put forth has had zero data to back it up. Every equasion you have mentioned has not justified any numbers presented anywhere on this thread.
4. I would happily say so once, but you seem to not understand what I say and continue to attack me instead of providing numerical, or other, proof of your claims. This website is for providing information to players to use in-game to better their characters. So far I have not been the one blindly arguing points.
I have discussed things you have posted and provided a different explanation for how things work; then you go out on a tangent trying to discredit me using logical fallacies:
Attacking the Person and
Straw Man Fallacy.
You keep making this argument about me, when in fact the argument at hand is simply, "Any race can play any class effectively".
I say "yes", you say "no". We provide information supporting our theories in regards to that argument.
I mearly stated at the end of one of my argumentative posts, that you should construct your paragraphs in a more organized mannor. I did not use that to discredit you, but to inform you that the information you are providing could not be properly extracted. This was my defense for you accusing me of "dodging questions". That is the only reason for that - I did not discredit you in any way by stating that; nor have I resorted scynical remarks.
I have no problems arguing my points here, I believe it is good to argue points. I am always open to being wrong. I have been wrong many times in the past, and I am sure I will again be wrong in the future. I have just not seen any proof of what you are claiming in the posts you have made.
Again to reitterate:
Given that any race can wear any armor or weapons combination within X class, where X is the same for both compared races. Also given, armor and weapon combinations are able to enhance a characters stats in a multitude of ways. Can any compared race effectively play class X, with potentially equal outcomes? My answer is "yes".